Showing posts with label Suppression of Technologies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Suppression of Technologies. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Wash Cyclist Censorship?


Interesting article at The Was Cyclist about MD State plans for a vehicular underpass at the Viers Mill & Randolf Road intersection in Montgomery County, Maryland:



https://www.thewashcycle.com/2019/03/moco-deputy-director-says-complete-streets-are-too-expensive-and-too-hard-on-drivers.html



The article is critical of the vehicular underpass proposal, as are the comments that appeared on my computer's screen showing of this Wash Cycle article.

---

This is disappointing to see with Montgomery County claiming to want to improve cycling and walking throughout the County. Reminds me of the ICC trail. 

This show staff are not serous about Vision Zero.
"The Draft Plan has the goal of recreating Veirs Mill Road as a "complete street." This concept which would treat the safety and mobility needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motor vehicles more or less equally-is normally reserved for urban environments where all are moving closer to the same pace."

A: Even in very dense urban environments this isn't true. I'm definitely getting someplace faster when I bike/drive compared to walking. And biking is really only competitive when traffic is really heavy and I get lucky with lights.

B: And that's the whole point of a complete street. In that case it makes even more sense on a road where you can get up to speed. Making Veirs Mill a perfect candidate for complete streets for the exact reasons its argued that its a bad one.

C: "It's a suburb" is not some magical cantrip you can utter to stop debate on something. If it doesn't work in online comments sections it certainly shouldn't be parroted by actual policy makers.
Honestly, the County and the State are horrible on pedestrian and cycling issues. And they're surprised that death rates are rising. News flash: you built traffic sewers that run right through densely populated, mixed use areas.
This is not very different from the perspective of DDOT engineers. When it's a hard choice between safety and car speeds, car speeds win 9 times out of 10.

As a society, we care much more about driving fast than not killing people.
Any consideration of a vehicular underpass with a traffic circle atop?

To help with envisioning such a solution, please look at WDC's DuPont Circle as well as my cir. year 2000 Rt 1/Beltway "Alexandria Orb" proposal.

---


So I made the comment that appears at the end of the list of published comments.  OK.  Good.  And I even took the opportunity to fill the box for the commentator's url with that of my blog "A Trip Within The Beltway".

http://wwwtripwithinthebeltway.blogspot.com/



OK.

But when I check on the article about 10 minutes later, my comment is absent.

Why might that be?



Saturday, March 28, 2015

MIT-Academia's Contempt for Humanity


2014: Jonahan Gruber, who was recently exposed for revealing the fraud behind Obamacare and by extension Romney/Care of a scheme that presents numbers suggesting it as an endless money pit due to the nonsense occurring with enforced medicine starting during the early 1900s.  Such as choices as this.  And the pharma market protectionism against God Given herbs as this.


1989: Let's not forget that MIT was used as the platform for the 'debunking ' of low temperature nuclear fusion -- otherwise known as "cold fusion" -- during the late 1980s.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/12/30/the-history-of-mits-blatant-suppression-of-cold-fusion/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion
On 30 April 1989, cold fusion was declared dead by the New York Times. The Times called it a circus the same day, and the Boston Herald attacked cold fusion the following day.[47]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones

Remember that the bullsh*t factor goes up exponentially in situations involving a massive threat to the existing economic order.